Ardnamurchan 10, 2015, Decadent Drinks, Decadent Drams, 2025, 55%. WB289307

The standard ten years-olds didn’t impress me much, but as a 10 years old cask strength was released, it was gone before you could say yikes-a-ten-years-old-cask-strength-from-Ardnamurchan-what-a-lovely-distillery-i-need-one…Now Decadent Drinks released this one, and I didn’t hesitate. Was it worth it?

Nose: Slightly alcoholic, sparkling. Some dates and dried figs, not particularly rich, somewhat subdued, smoky aromas such as cigar and ashtray dominate the dimensions. A hint of pipe and tobacco. In the background and occasionally in the foreground, waves of sweat float through the air.

Palate: Sweet, also slightly sour, a little salty, peppery. Cloves and nutmeg. A slightly nutty note, perhaps marzipan? And a kind of aniseed note, or is it eucalyptus? In any case, not so decadent.

Finish: Disappears very quickly, depending on how big the sip was. The sweetness sticks in the mouth. A few tannins remain.

89/88/88

Lammerlaw, Willowbank, 1988-1992, van Wees, 46%, 2025, WB289472

Where to start? I came across this bottling while randomly scrolling through the Whiskybase pages. Obviously, this isn't a Scotch, but a single malt from New Zealand, produced by the New Zealand Malt Whisky Company and sold under the Milford brand. The distillery has already been dismantled. Do not confuse it with the Lammerlaw Distillery in Scotland, which closed a long time ago. The whisky is named after the spring that provides the distillery with its main ingredient; however, according to various resources, it is also said to be named after the mountains in Dunedin. This is a marriage of first fill barrels from 1988 and 1992.

The nose is bold and rich with notes of manuka honey and ripe pineapple. Waves of candy aromas and fruity notes: cotton candy, lots of vanilla, like a cloud of sweet vanilla custard powder. Ripe peaches and apricots. Hints of herbal notes make this an interesting olfactory experience.

Palate: Spices, mustard and candied ginger. There is a hint of wood spice, perhaps sandalwood. Some tannins. The sweetness is profound, but the richness retreats in favour of low, waxy, oaky notes.

Finish: Perhaps the low ABV of 46% results in a thin, short finish. Some waxiness lingers in the mouth. There is dryness in the cheeks.

93/89/88

The Cairn, First Peek, 2025, 3 yrs, 57%, WB291768

The Cairn is situated in the middle of a nature reserve and they are not even allowed to mature their whisky on site, I was told when I visited the distillery in 2025. They said the whisky is transported to Benromach. During the tour, which reminded me more of a great show than a distillery facility, I was also told that they do not intend to release their first bottling until it is at least 10 or 12 years old, but definitely not 3. Perhaps I misunderstood them...There is even a giant circular clock indicating future releases (see below).

Nose: Alcoholic punch – they should have waited a few more years. It's very tingling, almost burning, to the nose. If you can endure the burning sensation, you can detect vanilla notes and creamy, milky sweets. But that’s it; the next burning sensation hits and knocks you out. If you dare to smell it again, you might detect some crème brûlée notes. Wild, harsh, untamed youthfulness.

Palate: I must admit it's very sweet, almost artificially so. There are typical new make notes, such as pear and bad grappa. There is also a malty flavour and a burning, numbing sensation from the alcohol. Sorry, but there's just no point in drinking this further.

Finish: None.

OK, maybe after the second or third sip, some oak notes and an oily sensation linger in the mouth. Why didn't they wait? Why the rush? 1000 bottles of this toxic drink – who is going to drink it all? But, as a great man once said: 'Wisdom is the reward for surviving our own stupidity.' Brian Rathbone.

79/77/70